Prevention Of Pressure Ulcer

Woman In 19th Century By Fuller Essays -

Lady In nineteenth Century By Fuller In her paper Woman in the Nineteenth Century, Margaret Fuller talks about the condition of marriage in America during the 1800?s. She is her very own casualty information, and is truly viewed as monstrous in light of her shrewdness. She feels that if certain generalizations can be separated, ladies can have the regard of men mentally, genuinely, and inwardly. She clarifies why a portion of the disparities exist in relationships around her. Fuller feels that once ladies are acknowledged as equivalents, people will be capable accomplish a genuine romance not yet know to the individuals of the world. Fuller exemplifies what's going on with the musings of individuals in nineteenth century society. She is an accomplished, appealing lady but, in America she is viewed as unmarriageable in light of the unintended terrorizing her insight delivers. She can't get why men would not have any desire to discover a lady with whom they can carry on a shrewd, significant discussion and still be truly pulled in to. She realizes that when this feeling of inadequacy is moved beyond, ladies will begin to exceed expectations taking all things together various fields. My translation is that Fuller feels if ladies are taught what's more, gifted then they will have the option to deal with themselves until the privilege man tags along. Their caution will be ten times, and they will have the option to pause for the famous ?Mr. Right?. Fuller gives three brilliant instances of how uniformity gets separated in a marriage. The first is the ?family unit partnership?(42), where the man heads out to work and gets by to help the family, and the lady remains at home shoeless and pregnant, deals with the youngsters and keeps an eye on the house. There is a common esteem between the a couple since the two of them keep up their finish of the deal. In any case, there is no affection incorporated with this relationship. Couples like this are simply enhancing each other's presence, he by attempting to help her, and her by cooking and cleaning for him. At the point when she expresses ?this connection is acceptable, as far as it goes?(42), Fuller suggests that ladies are making due with the purpose of settling. In the nineteenth century there was a disgrace appended to any lady in her twenties who was not yet hitched. Fuller inquiries why two individuals would settle for one another when there are such a large number of individuals with various things to offer one another. I imagine that marriage is holy to her, not in a strict sense, yet in a good and scholarly sense. She feels that individuals who are to be marry ought to have the option to take a gander at one another and express ?this is the individual I will impart an amazing remainder to?, and with that, they ought to be flawlessly glad. At the point when she checks out America that isn't what she sees. The second model Fuller gives is of ?idolatry?(42). By this model she implies the individuals who lose all sense of direction in the physical magnificence of each other. They think they love each other, however they are really longing for each other. They can consider only one another, nothing else appears to issue to them, and they don't care what others think since they realize they are enamored. The relationship is as shallow as the individuals associated with it. Be that as it may, as Fuller derives, in a relationship, for example, this, the looks will start to blur and the emotions will be sure to follow. Since the relationship was shaped exclusively based on looks, the marriage will have nothing to count on. We should recall that this isn't the year 2,000, where separation is as basic as marriage itself. When they said ?till death do us part? in the nineteenth century, they would not joke about this. Toward the finish of this model says Fuller, the lady will take a gander at the man as ?a feminine kid?, and he will consider her to be ?an unattractive syren?(42). Over the long haul, she won't regard him as a man, since she thinks of him as a ?pretty kid?, and he won't regard her for utilizing her hopes to trick him into wedding her. They will despise each other for the remainder of their lives. They will experience their days saying ?I ought to have done this? or on the other hand ?I ought to have done that?. Fuller would prefer never wed than cut off up in an association like this. The third case of the breakdown of equity is in the relationship of ?scholarly companionship?(42). Fuller clarifies that this

Managing the Balance of Power in Relationships

Managing the Balance of Power in Relationships Relationships Print Managing the Balance of Power in Relationships By Leonard Holmes Updated on July 13, 2018 JGI/Jamie Grill/Getty Images More in Relationships Spouses & Partners LGBTQ Violence and Abuse Most of us dont like to think about power when we think about relationships. Intimate relationships  involve sharing and cooperation â€" but it  takes two to share  and cooperate. What if one partner doesnt want to? Whoever wants less of a relationship has more power. The most obvious example of this principle is divorce. It just takes one person to end a relationship. It doesnt  matter how much the other partner wants the marriage to work. This basic principle can be seen in many smaller interactions. Dinner and a movie? Only if both partners want to. Sex? That too works best when it is consensual and cooperative. Certainly, sex is not always consensual, but relationships dont usually last long after marital rape or other forms of non-consensual sex. What makes non-consent such a potent tool? Not only does it put the non-consenter in the position of decision-maker, but it also sends a clear message that my desires are more important than yours. For the partner who wants more from a relationship, this can be a devastating message to receive. It suggests that, for the future, the non-consenting partner will have the option of choosing to withhold or grant cooperation, affection, and support â€" with no regard for the needs or desires of the other member of the relationship. Responding to Non-Cooperation in a Relationship There are really only three possible responses to non-cooperation in a relationship. The first is to accept the decision of the non-consenter, whatever it may be, in order to maintain at least a semblance of cooperation and mutuality. This option, while it may be acceptable for a period of time, cedes control completely. For most people, it is not a viable long-term solution.The second is to fight for cooperation â€" a risky choice for someone who strongly desires a relationship.The third is to walk away, saying â€" in essence â€" If you choose not to support me or join me, Ill go it alone or find someone else to give me the support or companionship I need. While this option may seem like the most promising, it can also be the most difficult for a person who relies on an existing relationship for security and self-esteem. If this is the case, then how do relationships last? Trust is an essential component. When we trust our partner we are, in part, trusting that they wont leave. We are also trusting that our partner will consider our needs and desires when making decisions that will affect both partners. This trust is built gradually.  If someone proves trustworthy in small ways we then take the risk of trusting them with even more. Human relationships are about much more than power. These relationships are about intimacy, friendship, love, respect, curiosity, contentment,  sharing, communication and much more. Despite this, its still true that whoever wants less of a relationship has more power. In a good relationship, power shifts back and forth, as each partner considers the others needs and takes or cedes power accordingly. The 6 Best Online Marriage Counseling Programs

The Holocausts Effect on the German Jew Essay - 1745 Words

Adolf Hitler came to power over Germany in January of 1933. He hated Jews and blamed them for everything bad that had ever happened to Germany. Hitler’s goal in life was to eliminate the Jewish population. With his rise to power in Germany, he would put into action his plan of elimination. This is not only why German Jews were the main target of the Holocaust, but why they were a large part of the years before, during, and after the Holocaust. Hitler’s â€Å"final solution† almost eliminated the Jewish population in Europe during World War II. At the end of the war and along with his suicide, the Jewish population would survive the horror known as the Holocaust and the Jews would eventually find their way back to their homeland of Israel†¦show more content†¦2). Even though this was not a violent treatment of the Jews, it was an attempt to bankrupt and dehumanize them of everything they had worked for their whole lives (Jews in Nazi Germany pg. 2) . As a result, Jews became a segregated people. They had to ride on buses and trains only in the seat that were clearly marked for them (Jews in Nazi Germany pg. 2). Jewish children were allowed to be bullied at school in an attempt to keep them from coming to school. Hitler used this to brand the Jews as a lazy people (Jews in Nazi Germany pg. 2). The Nuremberg Laws passed in 1935 gave even more power to the Nazis and took away more dignity of the Jews. The Jews were stripped of their German citizenship and marriages between Jews and non-Jews were not allowed (Jews in Nazi Germany pg. 2). At this point, the Jews who could afford to pay a fine to leave the country were allowed to do so, but the ones who could not afford it had to stay behind and were not allowed to get food or medicine (Jews in Nazi Germany pg. 2). Hitler’s campaign against the Jews escalated in 1938 with â€Å"Krystalnacht† – The Night of the Broken Glass (Jews in Nazi Germany pg. 2). After a Nazi diplomat was found shot to death, Hitler began a seven day war of terror against the Jews (Jews in Nazi Germany pg. 2). Shops that were owned by Jews were destroyed and robbed, homes and synagogues burnedShow MoreRelatedPainful Experiences of the Holocaust in the Novel, Night by Elie Wiesel1185 Words   |  5 Pagesand pain that transformed their lives as these experiences deprived them of their humanity and trust in others. The novel ‘’Night’’ depicts the extraordinary and painful experiences that many Holocaust prisoners endured: portraying the traumatizing effects it had on the survivors. The novel is written by Eliezer’s perspective as a survivor whose faith in god, faith in humanity, and sense of justice in the world are affected by the impact of his experiences during the Holocaust. Eliezer lived in SighetRead MoreThe Holocaust1225 Words   |  5 Pagesmeans a systematic, bureaucratic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of approximately six million Jews during the WWII by German Nazi. Adolf Hitler the leader of Nazis, who afraid Jews would take power over Germans; also, many Germans felt they were mistreated by the lost so Jews were like a scapegoat from the previous war lose so they can treat them inhumanely (â€Å"The Holocaust†). Millions of Jews were sent to the concentration camps around Europe. In there, they were tortured and killed. Many horribleRead MoreEssay on Causes Effects of the Holocaust1422 Words   |  6 PagesCauses Effects of the Holocaust There are times in history when desperate people plagued by desperate situations blindly give evil men power. These men, once given power, have only their own evil agendas to carry out. The Holocaust was the result of one such mans agenda. In short simplicity, shear terror, brutality, inhumanity, injustice, irresponsibility, immorality, stupidity, hatred, and pure evil are but a few words to describe the Holocaust. A holocaust is defined as a disaster thatRead MoreBoko Haram : A Islamic Organization1445 Words   |  6 Pages Since then, the devastation that Boko Haram has caused in Africa’s most populous country in order to overthrow the government and establish an Islamic state is similar to the Holocaust because while the Holocaust caused a genocide to all European Jews, Boko Haram caused a genocide to all of Nigeria. Because Boko Haram believes in a version of Islam where Muslims should not engage in any political or social activity related with Western society (i.e. receiving a nonreligious education, wearingRead MoreThe Nazi Party s Inner Circle Essay1538 Words   |  7 Pagesinside all of us†, but instead that Germans in the 1930s and 1940s were not what Browning would call â€Å"ordinary men†. Goldhagen’s thesis rides on his assertion that, at this point in time, the German public were inherently anti-Semitic, and that Hitler’s eliminationist rhetoric was simply the spark that ignited what was already inevitable, due to the views of the majority of Germans. If Goldhagen’s work is a more accurate description of the true motivations of the German people of the time, it would undermineRead MoreA Relationship Between Fathers And Sons Being Broken By Selfish Acts1234 Words   |  5 Pagesones can soon be viewed as dead weight, just another burden to carry, simi lar to a newborn baby. This is what transpires between numerous sons and their father’s in Night. On a ride to a camp in central Germany, German citizens decide to amuse themselves by throwing bread to the starving Jews, who scramble madly for every crumb. One man manages to find himself a rather sizable piece, but is killed by his own son before he can eat it, crying â€Å"Meir, my little Meir! Don’t you recognize me . . . You’reRead MoreNegative Effects Of The Holocaust1466 Words   |  6 Pagesnations as well. Since the Holocaust, leaders and lawmakers in the United States have analyzed the causes that led to this event and designed laws and documents to prevent such an infraction of human rights from happening again. The long-lasting effects of the Holocaust, which expose the dangers of America’s isolation and conservative immigration policies, contribute to the liberalization of American immigration and increased worldwide instances of United State s humanitarian intervention. FromRead MoreThe World War II And Nazi Concentration Camps1935 Words   |  8 Pagesthan any previous war. Among the estimated 45-60 million people killed were 6 million Jews murdered in Nazi concentration camps as part of Hitler’s diabolical â€Å"Final Solution,† now known as the Holocaust. In this research paper, we will basically cover the topic on the origins of hostility toward Jews, Nazi’s persecution, aftermath of the holocaust, and Jewish reparations after WWII. Origins of Hostility toward Jews In the aftermath of World War I, Germany remained in turmoil throughout the 1920s, providingRead More Elie Wiesel’s Night and Corrie Ten Booms The Hiding Place Essay2856 Words   |  12 Pagescollection, entitled Night, is a terrifying account of Wiesel’s boyhood experience as a WWII Jewish prisoner of Hitler’s dominant and secretive Nazi party. At age 16 he was taken from his home in Sighet, Romania and became one of millions of Jews sent to German concentration camps. At the Auschwitz and Buchenwald, Wiesel witnessed the death of his parents and sister. In 1945, the latter of the camps was overtaken by an American resistance group and the remaining prisoners freed, including the drasticallyRead MoreThe Hiding Place vs. Night2929 Words   |  12 Pagescollection, entitled Night, is a terrifying account of Wiesels boyhood experience as a WWII Jewish prisoner of Hitlers dominant and secretive Nazi party. At age 16 he was taken from his home in Sighet, Romania and became one of millions of Jews sent to German concentration camps. At the Auschwitz and Buchenwald, Wiesel witnessed the death of his parents and sister. In 1945, the latter of the camps was overtaken by an American resistance group and the remaining prisoners freed, including the drastically

How Hitler Caused Wwii Essay - 1159 Words

Adolf Hitler Caused World War II May 1, 2012 Adolf Hitler Caused World War II As I’m sure most people know Adolf Hitler was the leader of the Germans from August 2 1934 to April 30 1945, but do you know that as Fuhrer of Germany he was the driving force behind the start of WWII. During his reign he tried to bring Germany back to the powerful country it had been before the First World War. In this paper I will prove that Hitler’s actions lead to start of WWII, and I plan to prove how his direct disregard of the Treaty of Versailles pushed the world into WWII. I will begin with a little background on Hitler and what led him to become the Fuhrer of Germany. Hitler was a member of the German army during the First World War and,†¦show more content†¦Then a month later President Hindenburg died, which made Hitler the head of state. This allowed him to control all aspects of Germany, and also allowed him to start rebuilding the military forces that had been ordered to disband with the passing of the Treaty of Versailles. This was probably the biggest step thus far that would send Germany to war yet again. Along with that he had personally taken over as leader of the military when Werner von Blomberg had openly told Hitler that he disagreed with him about having the military ready to go to war as soon as 1938. (Shire, 1960) Over the next few months he had stripped 16 generals and had 44 more transferred because they were believed to not be sufficiently pro-Nazi. On February 3, 1933 during a meeting with German military leaders Hitler said his foreign policy was the conquest of Eastern Europe (Weinberg, 1970), also in 1933 Germany withdrew from the League of Nations, which should have been a warning sign that they were planning something big. This along with the increase of the Wehrmacht (German Army) to 600,000 should have thrown up some red flags to Britain and France that Hitler was up to no go. This was another of Hitler’s direct violations of the Versailles Treaty, yet no one stopped him, instead they let him continue untouched. Then in March of 1936Show MoreRelatedThe War I And World War II Essay1639 Words   |  7 Pages which eventually laid out the foundation for WWII. The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles led to the aggression of Germany. The Treaty of Versailles was supposed to bring about peace, but Marshall Foch, generalissimo of the Allied Armies in France believed that instead, it was an armistice for twenty years. The causes of WWII can easily be traced back to the unresolved issues of WWI, thus bringing about the idea of the â€Å"Thirty Years War.† WWII is the second half of a longer â€Å"Thirty Years WarRead MoreHow Far Do You Agree That the Policy of Appeasement Was the Main Cause of WWII?1551 Words   |  7 PagesGermany, it ended the war between Germany and the Allied Powers. The Treaty of Versailles was signed on 28 June 1919. Hitler saw the Treaty of Versailles as a disgrace to the German people and an embarrassment to Germany. Hitler blam ed the German politicians for signing the Treaty of Versailles as he thought Germany could have avoided it and the problems it presented Germany with. Hitler first broke the Treaty of Versailles in 1934. The way he broke the treaty was over Germany’s armed forces, he brokeRead MoreAmerican War And The Vietnam War Essay1714 Words   |  7 Pagesthe 1940s through the 1970s. During WWII, the United States military fought a foe that the American public, and the world alike, saw as an enemy to the human race, which caused Americans to unify in their efforts to fight in the battle. In contrast, US military actions in Vietnam were not fully backed by the American public or American allies, in which caused many people from the country to lose trust and faith in America. Wars have points that define them. In WWII, it was the attack on Pearl HarborRead MoreThe Concentration Camps During The Holocaust1508 Words   |  7 Pagesunnerving events in not only WWII, but even world history . The treatment that citizens like Jews had to experience still influence people nearly 70 years later, after the end of World War II in 1945. The establishment that began this process was known as the Nazi Regime. Their ideas lead by Adolf Hitler brainwashed millions of Germans to believe that the concentration camps were the right thing to establish . The operation of concentration camps during the Holocaust in WWII was the most inhumane eventRead MoreWhy Did The Allies Win World War II?1480 Words   |  6 PagesEurope it is know for Adolf Hitler’s need for what he called the â€Å"superior race† (Adolf Hitler) that he believed everyone should be and the holocaust. (Hughes, Britannica, WWII) World War II was also the war that included almost every country in the world and caused the most deaths of all time, even today it still holds the record for most deaths especially for a six-year period of time. (Hughes, Britannica, WWII) The Beginning of World War II World War II began September 1939 and started when GermanyRead MoreIndustrial Revolution Essay1189 Words   |  5 Pagesincreased and was more valuable. However, not just factories came from the Industrial Revolution. Nationalism, which is the pride in ones country, resulted from the Industrial Revolution. People were proud of their products and being innovative, which caused the growth of military strength. With more time, militaries could be built up. So many things exploded from the Industrial Revolution which affected the way the world’s infrastructure and economy runs today. Next, the Enlightenment is anotherRead MoreThe Influence of the Treaty of Versailles on the Outbreak of World War II931 Words   |  4 Pages The Treaty of Versailles influenced the outbreak of WWII by angering the Germans, weakening their country, and making Germany vulnerable to Hitler’s influence. The Treaty of Versailles was made to keep Germany from stirring up commotion again by starting another war. It was signed at the end of WWI, which the Germans had lost, and therefore they were forced to sign the treaty, which took away their colonies, sectioned their land, made them pay for other countries military costs, and forcedRead MoreWorld War II1190 Words   |  5 Pagesï » ¿WWII Reading Questions http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/era.cfm?eraID=15smtID=2 1. Who was Joe Louis, why is he important, and why did he help to increase black enlistment into the military? He was important because he defeated a white boxer and encouraged blacks to enlist in the army 2. What was the first concentration camp and when was it set up? Dachau, 1933 3. What groups of people were targeted during the Holocaust? Jews, Gypsies, Polish Catholic, Russians, mentally and physicallyRead MoreThe Parliamentary Debate On The Munich Agreement Essay1452 Words   |  6 Pagesthe U.S. was great. Among other causes, the Munich Agreement was one of many things that came into in existence paving the way for WWII to begin. As addressed in the Parliamentary Debate on the Munich Agreement, many in the British Parliament (Winston Churchill, Neville Chamberlain, etc.) discussed the course of action that should be taken regarding Germany and Hitler. Many, including Neville Chamberlain signed this agreement in hopes of maintaining peace, others, like Winston Churchill believed thatRead MoreEffects Of War On Humanity : Wwii And The Holocaust1639 Words   |  7 PagesThe Effects of War On Humanity WWII and the Holocaust are two of the most horrific events in history. WWII was a global war that lasted from 1939 to 1945 and was the deadliest war in history. Adolf Hitler came into power in 1933 and remained in power throughout the rest of WWII. Hitler was disobeying the restrictions put on him by Treaty of Versaille and was gaining power. Other countries saw how powerful Germany was getting and didn t want to get in Hitler s way. They were scared that if they

Role of Stakeholder Paper Free Essays

Role of Stakeholder Paper Jasmine Zeno MGT/420 November 1, 2012 Dr. Allen Timmons Role of Stakeholder Paper Introduction The purpose of this paper is to identify who are the stakeholders in an organization and the importance they play within an organization. First I will identify what a stakeholder is and explain how important stakeholders are to the growth of the organization. We will write a custom essay sample on Role of Stakeholder Paper or any similar topic only for you Order Now Next I will explain how and identify the quality management process and how the stakeholders play an important role in the implementation quality management process. Finally I will conclude by using Federal Express as an example organization from our reading how they were able to involved different stakeholders within their organization to roll out a new process. Stakeholder and their importance with an Organization Stakeholder is someone who has an interest in the well being of the organization. A Stakeholder can be defined as a person, group, or organization that may have either a direct or indirect stake in an organization and can be affected by the actions, objectives, and policies of the organization or have an effect on the actions, objectives and policies and organization may take (Business Dictionary, 2012). Stakeholders are essential to the growth of any organization because of the role each one of the stakeholders plays. Stakeholders can be internal; internal is someone who works for the organization who provides an important service for the organization. A stakeholder can also be external as well; external can be someone who invest money into the organization but is not involved in the day to day running of the organization. It is important to understand the roles and the influence that a stakeholder has in implementing a quality management process. For one to understand the importance a stakeholder plays in implementing the process one would have to understand and really what a stakeholder is and the role they play in the implementation of the quality management process. Quality management and its importance The culture of the organization plays an important part of the implementation in quality management process, and understanding how the stakeholder plays an important part in the implementation process is important. According to our reading the management processes that overarch and tie together the control and assurance activities make up quality management (S. Thomas Foster, 2007). It is important for an organization to have effective quality management. The reading states that a number of mangers, supervisors, and employees are all involved in quality management. Such as, planning for quality improvement, creating a quality organizational culture, providing training and retraining and providing leadership and support and the list goes on (S. Thomas Foster, 2007). Federal Express management evaluation system Federal Express doors open in 1973; there were eight small aircrafts at that time to handle the workload. Now today Federal Express is one of the world’s largest cargo fleet. FedEx’s philosophy guide management policies and actions were â€Å"People-Service-Profit (S. Thomas Foster, 2007). FedEx integrate all levels when implementing a policies within in their organization. Let’s take for example FedEx management evaluation system called SFA (survey, feedback, action) that involved a survey of employees, analysis of each group’s results by the work group’s manager, and a discussion between the manager and the work group to develop written action plans for the manager to improve and become more effective (S. Thomas Foster, 2007). Conclusion Stakeholders play an important role in the implementation and the affect that each one of the stakeholders has all depends on the type of control they have as a stakeholder. For the implementation to be successful it is important to know who the stakeholders are and each one of their needs. Stakeholder’s roles within the organization are vital to the growth and the successes of the organization. Involving stakeholders in the implementation in any process within the organization has proven to be a right decision. References S. Thomas Foster. (2007). Managing Quality. Integrating the Supply Chain. Retrieved from S. Thomas Foster, MGT/420 website. Stakeholder. (2012). In Business Dictionary. Retrieved from http://www. businessdictionary. com/definition/stakeholder. html How to cite Role of Stakeholder Paper, Papers

Medical Testing On Animals Essays (538 words) - Animal Welfare

Medical Testing On Animals Matchmaker.com: Sign up now for a free trial. Date Smarter! Medical Testing On Animals Animals have been used in medical research for centuries. Most of the animals used for research are rodents - rats, mice, hamsters and gerbils. Some dogs, cats and a variety of goats, ferrets, pigeons, monkeys and rabbits are also used .The struggle against this tyranny is a struggle as important as any of the moral and social issues that have been fought over in recent years. Animal rights are an emotional issue-second only, perhaps, to the bitter abortion debate." For decades the value of animal research has been grossly overrated. Although researchers have depended on animal test data to achieve medical advances, there should be other means of research because testing on animals is cruel, inhumane, and often unnecessary. The American Medical Association believes that research involving animals is absolutely essential to maintaining and improving the health human beings. They point out, that virtually every advance in medical science in the 20th century, from antibiotics to organ transplants, has been achieved either directly or indirectly through the use of animals in laboratory experiments. They also emphasize that animal research holds the key for solutions to AIDS, cancer, heart disease, aging and congenital defects. Lastly they insist that, the result of these experiments has been the elimination or control of many infectious diseases. This has meant a longer, healthier, better life with much less pain and suffering for humans. For many patients, it has meant life it self. However, there should be other means of research because the whole process of animal research remains cruel and inhumane. Animal rights activists have gathered a large amount of information that has closed down many laboratories that violate anti-cruelty statutes. In the past, research labs have had to be subsequently suspended due to animal cruelty. Reports involving horrifyingly painful experiments on monkeys and the filthy laboratories the animals must live in. Animals limited to living in tiny metal cages in which they can barely move. From the capture of primates in the wild, to the "factory-like" breeding of mice and dogs, to the confinement and isolation of cages - research is inherently cruel. Animal research is often unnecessary, history has shown that many important medical advances have been made by clinical research and close observations of human patients, not animals. There are countries that don't use healthy animals to train veterinarians or teach surgical techniques. In England they use only sick or injured animals and do most of their work on animal cadavers. Humans can give informed consent. Monkeys and dogs can't. Many AIDS patients have said they are willing to try out new drugs so why not let them. In most cases the drugs will need to be tested on humans before the FDA will approve them anyway and it is a known fact that not all drugs work the same on humans as they do on animals. Most of what we do to animals we would never do to people. We understand that people have certain rights that keep them from being experimented on by other people. What we don't realize is that it is impossible to justify rights for humans, who are a type of animal, and deny rights to non-human animals. Animals have a right to life just as humans have a right to life. Human morality must expand to acknowledge and respect the rights of non-human animals.